BORG Agent: We Will Arrest Adam Kokesh and Open Carry Protesters

 BORG, Government, Interview, psychopath, unethical  1 Response »
May 082013
 

We Will Arrest Adam Kokesh and Open Carry Protesters

BORG AGENT Threatens ARREST

Adam Kokesh is planning an open carry march on July 4, 2013 in the heart of Mordor on the Potomac (Washington D.C.).  He and other individuals are starting the march from the Arlington Cemetery, in Arlington Virginia.  They Plan to march with rifles strapped on their backs across the Memorial Bridge, down Independence Avenue, around the Capitol, the Supreme Court, & the White House, then peacefully return to Virginia across the Memorial Bridge.

BORG Agent (District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department Chief) Cathy Lanier says she will arrest Adam Kokesh and any other individual (Dirt Bag, Enemy, Terrorist, Protester, Uppity Slave,and never seen a Nigger on a horse before!) who violate the district’s gun laws.  Actually she probably won’t be the one doing the arresting. She will likely delegate that supposed authority to subordinates, who are likely larger, meaner BORG Agents /Thugs.  In the interview Cathy states it’s ok to do civil disobedience, as long as you don’t break the laws that threaten her or her masters.  My question is how can you be disobedient unless you break a law. Duh!

What is the LAW

“Passing into the District of Columbia with loaded firearms is a violation of the law and we’ll have to treat it as such,” she told NewsChannel 8. That’s Interesting that the Bill of Rights states clearly:

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What does the word “SHALL” mean?

As used in statutes and similar instruments, this word is generally imperative or mandatory; but it may be construed as merely permissive or directory, (as equivalent to “may,”) to carry out the legislative intention and In cases where no right or benefit to any one depends on its being taken in the imperative sense, and where no public or private right is impaired by its interpretation in the other sense. Also, as against the government, “shall” is to be construed as “may,” unless a contrary intention is manifest. See Wheeler v. Chicago, 24 111. 105, 76 Am. Dec. 736; People v. Chicago Sanitary Dist., 184 111. 597, 56 N. E. 9.”.:;: Madison v. Daley (C. C.) 58 Fed. 753; Cairo & F. R. Co. v. Ilecht, 95 U. S. 170, 24 L. Ed. 423. SHAM PLEA. See PLEA. SHARE 1082 SHERIFF

The right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL not be INFRINGED.  Lets look up the word infringed see what it means.

A breaking into; a trespass or encroachment upon; a violation of a law, regulation, contract, or right. Used especially of invasions of the rights secured by patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co. v. Jackson, 112 Fed. 140, 50 C. C. A. 159, 55 L. R. A. 092; Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co., 80 Fed. 721, 20 C. C. A. 107.

Hmmm, let’s make sure I got this straight, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be trespassed or encroached upon.  Wait a second, do BORG Agents (cops), in that area have guns (arms), I bet they do!  So, somewhere the is this thing called the “SUPREME LAW” stating very clearly, “the PEOPLE’s right to keep and bear arms SHALL not be infringed.  We the PEOPLE are being THREATENED  with ARREST by BORG Agents (cops), who don’t have the any rights, especially the right to keep and bear arms. These BORG agents are going to violate their oath of office by arresting PEOPLE who are being non violent? Well there is a critical step here, the BORG Agents, get PAID in Federal Reserve Notes, by the government and do whatever a whacked out psychopath tells them to do.  The Bill of Rights, doesn’t have any Federal Reserve Notes.  Too Bad…so Sad.
After their arrest, the PEOPLE, will go to a BORG administration hearing (Court). Is the BORG administration officer is going to rule in favor of the the PEOPLE?  Wrong! they will rule in favor of the BORG. Guess what?  The BORG administration officer, also gets paid in Federal Reserve Notes, as well.  Now, I get it!

Who is the Government here for?

If anyone doesn’t get it by now, let me splain…THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT HERE FOR YOU!  They are here for themselves!  We have to abandon the idea that Government can be fixed… IT WORKS PERFECTLY.  If you attempt to fix government, it will destroy you. PERIOD.
In order to get away from Government, it is necessary to ignore them.  This is something they cannot stand.  They are like referee’s and they are constantly stirring the populace to give them something to do.  Humanity needs to create organizations that make consistently Ethical Decisions.  Unanimous Ethical decisions, just like a Jury.  Divide and Conquer, this is the matrix we are in.  It’s time to break free.

Adam could be wants to take this issue up with the supreme court. I sure hope you got a plan. These BORG doesn’t like feedback, and the feedback of you and 10,000 others carrying a gun, they really dont like that.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Adam Kokesh plans to have 10,000 open carry activists march on the Capitol. Over 2,000 have so far pledged on Kokesh’s Facebook page to attend the July 4th event. Adam appeared on the Alex Jones Show on Monday to explain the march.

Zero Privacy in the Police State

 BORG, Government, unethical  No Responses »
May 072013
 

Surveillance in the Police State

IRS to Spy on Our Shopping Records, Travel, Social Interactions, Health Records and Files from Other Government Spies.

U.S. News and World Report notes today:the IRS tools will be able to track all credit card transactions, for starters. The agency has also instructed agents on using online sources such as social media and e-commerce sites including eBay, as well as the rich data generated by mobile devices. In one controversial disclosure in April, the ACLU showed documents in which the IRS general counsel said the agency could look at emails without warrants, but the IRS has said it will not use this power.

While the agency has declined to give details about what third-party personal data it will use in robo-audits and data mining, it has told government and industry groups that its computers are capable of scanning multiple networks at the same time to collect “matching” comprehensive profiles for every taxpayer in America. Such profiles will likely include shopping records, travel, social interactions and information not available to the public, such as health records and files from other government investigators, according to IRS documents.

Bradley Manning Pleads Guilty

 BORG, Hierarchy, unethical  No Responses »
May 052013
 

Bradley Manning Pleads Guilty

Bradley Manning is the Bravest man in the Army

“The U.S. Army private accused of providing secret documents to the WikiLeaks website pleaded guilty on Thursday to misusing classified material he felt “should become public,” but denied the top charge of aiding the enemy.”*

Bradley Manning is facing prosecution for giving military information to Wikileaks. He’s plead guilty to some charges. He maintains that he did release the information and that he did it because he wanted to help the country. What will happen with the other treasonous charges against him that could net a life sentence? Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

At the hearing, through his attorney Manning pleaded not guilty to the most serious charge, of aiding the enemy.

Manning, who has been jailed at Quantico Marine Base in Virginia for more than 1,000 days, could face life imprisonment if convicted of that charge at his June trial.

Bradley Manning’s Sentence Reduction

Under a ruling last month by Lind, Manning would have any sentence reduced by 112 days to compensate for the markedly harsh treatment he received during his confinement.  Wow what a benevolent Judge. Bradley Manning is facing 20 YEARS and the judge is giving him a whole 112 days for being TORTURED.    If this weren’t such a travesty I should be ROFLMAO!  “Harsh Treatment” this is CALLED TORTURE!

Leaders of the free world! The shining light on the hill!  How about the Manchurian Candidate, John McCain?

What a freaking joke! Bradley Manning is not even been convicted, supposedly innocent until proven guilty, this is how we treat innocent people?  While at Quantico, Manning was placed in solitary confinement for up to 23 hours a day with BORG agents  checking on him every few minutes.

1. Solitary Confinement/Isolation

2. Humiliation Techniques

3. Sleep Deprivation

4. Sensory Deprivation

5. Stress Positions

 

IRS to increase “pre-crime” enforcement

 BORG, Hierarchy, Legislation, unethical  No Responses »
Apr 262013
 

IRS to increase “pre-crime” enforcement

by Simon Black on April 12, 2011

April 12, 2011
Vina del Mar, Chile

Did you ever see Minority Report? It’s one of Steven Spielberg’s often forgotten about movies based on the short story by Philip K. Dick. In the movie, pre-couch Tom Cruise plays a police officer in the year 2054 who works for the highly specialized ‘pre-crime’ division.

Using a bizarre array of technology and metaphysics, the pre-crime division sees into the future and stops criminals in their tracks, arresting them before they commit a crime… sometimes before they even think about committing a crime.

minority report ui IRS to increase pre crime enforcement

This very elaborate and morally ambiguous law enforcement system is predicated on the government determining what your actions and intentions will be, often before you do. It’s not all science fiction.

A number of politicians and bureaucrats in Washington D.C. are seeking to step up the Internal Revenue Service’s powers, and technology, to essentially audit taxpayers before returns are even filed.

In remarks to the National Press Club last week, an IRS spokesman unveiled the agency’s vision for the “look forward” model in which most of the pertinent reporting information for the average taxpayer (W2, 1099, mortgage interest etc.) would be submitted to the IRS well in advance of the individual deadline.

After a massive upgrade in technology, the IRS would be able to pre-calculate what it expects to receive in taxes and instantly reject any return that doesn’t comply with its determination.

This may work fine and well for some wage earners… but start throwing in a few investment accounts, small business income, private partnerships, etc. and things can quickly diverge from the IRS estimates.

Imagine you start a new business on the side of your usual employment this year and take an initial loss due to ancillary startup costs. This wouldn’t factor into the machine’s pre-calculations of your tax liability, so you would be immediately rejected and flagged for additional scrutiny.

Makes you want to run out and start a business, or invest your capital in someone else’s, right? Not exactly.

Deep down, I think these people simply want to try and make things more efficient. Pre-crime is not the way to go. There are a number of countries that have incredibly successful tax codes, and there are common themes in all of them:

1) Keep it short. The Baltic countries are a great example of this– the entire Estonian tax code is about 70 pages, roughly 1/1000th the size of the US tax code (which is still prone to so much interpretation). It takes about 15 minutes to fill out an Estonian return, and you can do it online. In the Maldives, it’s even easier.

2) Keep it simple. When you have a tax code that’s so complex it has given rise to a multi-billion dollar preparation industry, you have a problem. There are dozens of different forms at the IRS, and over 20 versions for the 1099 alone! This is a system that is prone to massive flaws and a great deal of contradiction.

Hong Kong is a great example of a simple system. Taxes are levied at a flat rate of 15% based on the “territorial principal” that only income derived from Hong Kong is taxed. There is no capital gains tax, no VAT, no estate tax, etc. And yet, the biggest problem the Hong Kong government faces regarding taxes is how to give away their massive surplus.

3) Keep it low. When you make it easy and painless for people to pay taxes, it removes most of the incentives for them to cheat. In Singapore, tax rates are among the lowest in the world with a maximum rate of 20%. The capital gains rate is zero. The corporate rate varies from 0% to 17% (and keeps falling).

Under these circumstances, why cheat? By keeping rates low, the government is removing any incentive to engage in complicated (and costly) tax avoidance techniques. From a cost/benefit perspective, it’s much easier to comply when rates are low.

4) Keep it friendly. Creating an adversarial relationship with taxpayers doesn’t do anyone any favors. One of the key themes of the world’s most successful tax regimes is that they do not operate like a police agency that’s out to get people. This is a massive hurdle for the IRS to overcome.

Perhaps the polar opposite of this is Switzerland, where tax evasion is considered a civil matter, not a criminal matter. In Switzerland, the local cantonal tax authorities actually compete with each other for your business, rather than sticking you up for cash under penalty of imprisonment.

The US government is now searching for answers. Behind close doors, politicians are likely admitting to each other that the kitty is empty and they’re completely bankrupt. They don’t have to look far for solutions– the best models in the world are already in practice and have been successfully implemented.

Rather than making things easier, less painful, friendlier, and simpler, the US government seems to be taking the opposite approach– hiring more agents to sniff out ‘suspicious’ activity (defined in their sole discretion), raising taxes, and relying on fear and intimidation.

I suspect this path will have the opposite effect– instead of raising more money for a bankrupt government, it will continue to chase out productive people. More on that in a future letter.

Robert Podolsky 9/11 Explosive Evidence

 9/11, unethical  No Responses »
Mar 112013
 

Robert Podolsky- 9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts speak out

Mr. Podolsky explains how the Official Fire Story violates the Laws of Thermodynamics.

This interview is some raw footage of one of the world class experts appearing in architects and engineer’s upcoming hard hitting documentary “9/11:Explosive Evidence – Experts speak out”

http://www.ae911truth.org
Source (thx): http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth

The hour long train wreck

 media, unethical  No Responses »
Mar 082013
 

The Hour Long Train Wreck otherwise known at the CBS Presidential Debate.

By Morpheus Titania and Bob Podolsky

In the United States of America every four years there is a pageant that occurs in American politics known as the “Presidential Election” used by B.O.R.G. agents to CON-vince the “Plundered Class of Slaves” they are somehow “Free” and using a process called “voting” which converts this supposed “Freedom” into a measurement for which new ruler who is going to represent your interests and in some way improve the standard of living for the greatest number of slaves.

The Mind Expanding CON

To attain this incredibly high level of brainwashing, B.O.R.G.  agents of the (G for) Government work in league with the supposedly “unbiased” and non-connected agency known as the “The News” with the (B for Business) “CBS”, to perform this incredibly mind expanding CON.  Being aware of this programming effort, I have been avoiding watching any of these supposed “debates” and prefer watching the highlights instead.  However on Saturday, 11/12/ 2011, a group of my friends got together to watch this spectacle so I thought it was worth my while to hang out and watch what I now call “The Hour Long Train Wreck” which was broadcast as the “CBS Presidential debate”.
First of all, we have to be aware that this spectacle resembles in no way a debate between the parties that are vying for the office of president.   A debate is an event where opposing viewpoints are actually discussed.  This “Train Wreck” is nothing more than a conversation between two parties on the same side.  There is the Media, which is controlled by Big Government forces and the Forces of more Big Government!  This charade is like a psychopath arguing with himself about which college girl he wants to rape and dismember!   All the parties save one on the stage were in favor of more government, more wars, and more taxes and by default less Freedom.  I don’t even need to mention the only candidate on the stage who was for more Freedom was Ron Paul, whom the BORG agents conveniently allowed to received a paltry 89 seconds of “air time” whereas thirty six HUNDRED other seconds was consumed primarily by the self anointed (B for Business) “Moderators” and the  (G for Government) “Ruler” hopefuls. I didn’t waste my time to actually run a timer to see how much time the “Media” gave themselves however we could approximate:  8 candidates, with 2 receiving virtually no questions, so 6 candidates plus the moderators who appointed themselves to speak between each question works out to 3,600 divided by 6 equals 600 seconds, that would give each candidate 10 – 60 second questions each, but that doesn’t take into consideration “Media talk time”.   The “Media” granted themselves more than 50% of the appearances plus interruptions, as every other person who spoke was the Republican media apologist Frank Luntz or his co-host.   Wouldn’t it be simpler to “elect” the media as our supposed “representative” and save all the time, expense and bother to consider any real solutions?

B-Business and G-Government Agents

The entire broadcast “debate” was 3,600 seconds.  Being “Conservative” the media talk time was less than half the total at 1,800 seconds.  Generally their B-Business agents “questions” were not as long as the G-Government agents “answers”.  Even were the “Media talk time” at approximately 30 percent and 1,000 seconds, they still had more than half the appearances and had total control over who would get what question when.  They also granted themselves unlimited interruptions.  Out of 3 questions to Ron Paul he was interrupted on 2 of them!  Even were the time distributed equally among the rest of the G-Government agents, they were unable to even do that correctly, as evidenced by Ron Paul receiving a measly 89 seconds working out to 2.5% of the total time! Taking the 3,600 seconds minus the media time of 1,000 seconds, leaves 2,600 seconds left and distributed evenly amongst the other 6 would only give each candidate 433 seconds each.  What kind of reasonable person would even consider this a “Debate”?  This is no different than regular television programming where the show “content” is simply there to fill time between commercials. This led me to think of several options that would actually lead to more discussion about the actual issues and coming up with solutions to the problems the government creates in the first place.  The simplest of course would be to ask every candidate the same question.  Other more elaborate ones might include having each candidate rotate being the moderator and have that person perform the question asking.  The candidate asking the questions could use the time however he saw fit, firing questions at one candidate or all of them.  The media’s sole job in this scenario would be to make sure each candidate would have equal time as the question asker.  A final possibility would be to run the debate like a reality show: have the Main Stream media moderator declare a general subject and have the candidate talk about what he would do in this area.  Then at the end of the round there would be a vote on line and or with a text and there would be a tabulation of the scores with nearly instantaneous results viewable as the show is progressing.

The B.O.R.G. is the Parasite 

All the above mentioned possibilities which  would foster the creation of actual solutions and prevent the (B for Business) “Main Stream Media” from hijacking the debates as they have CONSISTENTLY done for years.  There is a maxim by of New York City “Boss” William M. Tweed, who by the way was one of THE most corrupt politicians in the United States history that goes,  “I do not care who does the electing as long as I get to decide who runs.”

NDAA Lawsuit – Tangerine Bolen vs Obama

 NDAA, unethical  No Responses »
Feb 272013
 

NDAA Lawsuit

The NDAA has been called the death of our NDAA Lawsuit - Tangerine Bolen vs Obamarepublican form of government. That acronym refers to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, which contains a provision allowing the president to order the indefinite military detention of anyone accused of offering substantial support to al-Qaeda or “associated forces.”

 

 

Journalist and activist Tangerine Bolen is one of eight plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the NDAA. Although she voted for Obama, she describes herself as “terrified” by the arbitrary powers that the president and his advisers can now exercise in the name of fighting terrorism.

Next News Network’s WHDT World News Program airs daily at 6pm and 11pm Eastern on Comcast, DirecTV and Over-the-Air and Online at http://usmediavault.com/WHDT.html

Tangerine Bolen – http://StopNDAA.ORG
WHDT World News is available to 6 million viewers from South Beach to Sebastian, Florida and to 2 million viewers in Boston, Massachusetts via WHDN.

WHDT broadcasts on RF channel 44 (virtual channel 9) from Palm City and is carried on cable TV channels 44 (SD) and 1044 (HD) by AT&T, on cable channels 17 (SD) and 438 (HD) in West Palm Beach by Comcast, on satellite channel 44 (SD) in West Palm Beach by DIRECTV, and on WHDN-Boston which broadcasts on RF channel 38 (virtual channel 6) from the Government Center district in downtown Boston.